Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs AMD FirePro W6170M

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs AMD FirePro W6170M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1477MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile +206%
6.05 TFLOPS
FirePro W6170M
1.971 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2021
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 20 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1185 MHz
Base Clock
-
1477 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
14
2048
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
64
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

47.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
94.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
12.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.050 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
189.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Emerald
-
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
2.08 billion
Unknown
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy