Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs AMD FirePro W5170M

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs AMD FirePro W5170M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and 2GB VRAM FirePro W5170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 60% (1477MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile +410%
6.05 TFLOPS
FirePro W5170M
1.184 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2021
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 20 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1185 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1477 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
2048
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
64
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

47.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.80 GPixel/s
94.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.00 GTexel/s
12.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.050 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1184 GFLOPS
189.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Tropo
-
GPU Variant
Tropo XT
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.5 billion
Unknown
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy