Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 750M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (967MHz vs 937MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.19GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX350 +61%
1.199 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 750M
0.743 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce MX350 +110%
122
GeForce GT 750M
58
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
Jan 2013
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

747 MHz
Base Clock
941 MHz
937 MHz
Boost Clock
967 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1003 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
56.06GB/s
Bandwidth
64.19GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.736 GPixel/s
29.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.94 GTexel/s
18.74 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1199 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
742.7 GFLOPS
37.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.94 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GK107
GP107-670-A1 (N17S-G5-A1)
GPU Variant
N14P-GT
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy