Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 635M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock937MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (56.06GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX350 +373%
1.199 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 635M
0.253 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce MX350 +624%
1232
GeForce GT 635M
170

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
Mar 2012
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

747 MHz
Base Clock
-
937 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
56.06GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
5
SM Count
2
640
Shading Units
96
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.640 GPixel/s
29.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.56 GTexel/s
18.74 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1199 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
253.4 GFLOPS
37.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
21.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GF108
GP107-670-A1 (N17S-G5-A1)
GPU Variant
N12E-GE-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net