Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs Intel Arc A570M

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs Intel Arc A570M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 and 8GB VRAM Arc A570M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)
Intel Arc A570M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (1300MHz vs 937MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX350
1.199 TFLOPS
Arc A570M +344%
5.325 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
Aug 2023
GeForce MX
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

747 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
937 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
56.06GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

14.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
83.20 GPixel/s
29.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
166.4 GTexel/s
18.74 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.65 TFLOPS
1199 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.325 TFLOPS
37.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
DG2-256
GP107-670-A1 (N17S-G5-A1)
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
132 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

20W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy