NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX330 and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (1594MHz vs 1207MHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 95W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX330
1.224 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Max Q
+404%
6.18 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2020
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce MX
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1531 MHz
Base Clock
682 MHz
1594 MHz
Boost Clock
1207 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
56.06GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
3
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
25.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.94 GPixel/s
38.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.56 GTexel/s
19.13 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.180 TFLOPS
1224 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.180 TFLOPS
38.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
96.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP108
GPU Name
GA107
GP108-655-A1
(N17S-G3-A1)
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
