NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX330 and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (2010MHz vs 1594MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX330
1.224 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+908%
12.35 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2020
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce MX
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1531 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
1594 MHz
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
56.06GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
3
SM Count
24
384
Shading Units
3072
24
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
25.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
38.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
19.13 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
1224 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
38.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP108
GPU Name
AD107
GP108-655-A1
(N17S-G3-A1)
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
