NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX330 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (1594MHz vs 1125MHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
7040 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX330
1.224 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max Q
+1264%
16.7 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2020
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 30 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1531 MHz
Base Clock
585 MHz
1594 MHz
Boost Clock
1125 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
56.06GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
3
SM Count
58
384
Shading Units
7424
24
TMUs
232
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
25.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
38.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
261.0 GTexel/s
19.13 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
16.70 TFLOPS
1224 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.70 TFLOPS
38.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
261.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP108
GPU Name
GA103S
GP108-655-A1
(N17S-G3-A1)
GPU Variant
GN20-E8-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
74 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
