Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 1024MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 565v to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 20W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250 +84%
0.797 TFLOPS
Mobility Radeon HD 565v
0.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
May 2010
GeForce MX
Generation
M9x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
384
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
M96
-
GPU Variant
M96 XT (216-0729051)
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Board Design

10W
TDP
20W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy