Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD FirePro W4170M

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD FirePro W4170M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro W4170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1038MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
AMD FirePro W4170M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250 +15%
0.797 TFLOPS
FirePro W4170M
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2015
GeForce MX
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
384
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
Opal
-
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

10W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy