NVIDIA GeForce MX230 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX230 and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX230 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 150W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1680MHz vs 1531MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
9472 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX230
0.784 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+4069%
32.69 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce MX
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1519 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
76
256
Shading Units
9728
16
TMUs
304
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
24.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
24.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
12.25 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
783.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
24.50 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
150W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP108
GPU Name
AD103
N17S-G0-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
