NVIDIA GeForce MX230 vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5725
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX230 and 256MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5725 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX230 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
136 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX230
+380%
0.784 TFLOPS
Mobility FireGL V5725
0.163 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce MX
Generation
Mobility FireGL
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1519 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
2
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
120
16
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
24.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.720 GPixel/s
24.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.440 GTexel/s
12.25 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
783.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.2 GFLOPS
24.50 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
10W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP108
GPU Name
M86
N17S-G0-A1
GPU Variant
M86-ME XT GL
(216-0683010)
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.378 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
135 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
