NVIDIA GeForce MX230 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX230 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX230 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 11.23GB/s)
248 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 13W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX230
+3820%
0.784 TFLOPS
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
0.02 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 9M(9000M)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1519 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
11.23GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
1
256
Shading Units
8
16
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
24.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.116 GPixel/s
24.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.116 GTexel/s
12.25 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
783.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
24.50 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
10W
TDP
13W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP108
GPU Name
G98
N17S-G0-A1
GPU Variant
G98-700-U2
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
UMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
80 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
