NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs NVIDIA NVS 5200M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX110 and 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX110 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1006MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (40.10GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 5200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 30W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX110
+114%
0.515 TFLOPS
NVS 5200M
0.24 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2017
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce MX(1xx)
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM
Clock Speeds
978 MHz
Base Clock
-
1006 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
40.10GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
256
Shading Units
96
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.048 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.500 GPixel/s
16.10 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
515.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
16.10 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM108S
GPU Name
GF117
N16V-GMR1-S-A2
GPU Variant
N13M-NS1
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.1
6.7 (5.1)
Shader Model
5.1
