Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3

NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX110 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX110 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1006MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (40.10GB/s vs 11.23GB/s)
248 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 30W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX110 +2475%
0.515 TFLOPS
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
0.02 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Nov 2017
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce MX(1xx)
Generation
GeForce 9M(9000M)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

978 MHz
Base Clock
-
1006 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
40.10GB/s
Bandwidth
11.23GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
256
Shading Units
8
16
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.048 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.116 GPixel/s
16.10 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.116 GTexel/s
-
-
-
515.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
16.10 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

30W
TDP
13W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM108S
GPU Name
G98
N16V-GMR1-S-A2
GPU Variant
G98-700-U2
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
80 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
6.7 (5.1)
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net