NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (1590MHz vs 1178MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 112.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (80W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 960
2.413 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
+18%
2.849 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2015
Release Date
Jul 2020
GeForce 900
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1127 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
1178 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.2GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
1024
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.70 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
75.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
2.413 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
75.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
80W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
TU116
GM206-300-A1
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
