NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960 and 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 31% (1545MHz vs 1178MHz)
More VRAM (10GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 112.2GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 960
2.413 TFLOPS
CMP 50HX
+358%
11.07 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce GTX 960
189
CMP 50HX
+632%
1384
Graphics Card
Jan 2015
Release Date
Jun 2021
GeForce 900
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1127 MHz
Base Clock
1350 MHz
1178 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
112.2GB/s
Bandwidth
560.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
1024
Shading Units
3584
64
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
5 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.70 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
123.6 GPixel/s
75.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.15 TFLOPS
2.413 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.07 TFLOPS
75.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
346.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
TU102
GM206-300-A1
GPU Variant
TU102-100-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
