NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM vs ATI FirePro V9800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 OEM and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1203MHz
ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 OEM
2.464 TFLOPS
FirePro V9800
+10%
2.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2016
Release Date
Sep 2010
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
-
1203 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1600
64
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
76.99 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.464 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
76.99 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM206S
GPU Name
Cypress
950 OEM
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0
