Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI Radeon X800 GTO

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI Radeon X800 GTO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 128MB VRAM Radeon X800 GTO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X800 GTO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 75W)

Score

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Dec 2007
GeForce 900
Generation
Radeon R400 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
350 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
49W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
R423
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
R423 GTO
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
R400
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.16 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
289 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0b (9_2)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
-
© 2025 - TopCPU.net