NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA P104 101
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 4GB VRAM P104 101 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 125W)
NVIDIA P104 101 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 41% (1683MHz vs 1190MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.3GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
P104 101
+371%
8.617 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Jan 2018
GeForce 900
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
1506 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
1683 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
256.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
768
Shading Units
2560
48
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
107.7 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
269.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
134.6 GFLOPS
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.617 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
269.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
125W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
GP104
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
GP104-101-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
