NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 215W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 44% (1710MHz vs 1190MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2080
+450%
10.07 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Sep 2018
GeForce 900
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
1515 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
46
768
Shading Units
2944
48
TMUs
184
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
368
-
RT Cores
46
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
109.4 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
314.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.14 TFLOPS
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.07 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
314.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
215W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
TU104
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
TU104-400A-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
