NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD FirePro W4100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
+183%
1.828 TFLOPS
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.08 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.16 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
645.1 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.32 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
Cape Verde
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
