NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI FireGL V7600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 127W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
+376%
1.828 TFLOPS
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Aug 2007
GeForce 900
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
127W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
R600
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
R600 GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
