NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1545MHz vs 1190MHz)
More VRAM (10GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
CMP 50HX
+505%
11.07 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
179
CMP 50HX
+673%
1384
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Jun 2021
GeForce 900
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
1350 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
560.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
768
Shading Units
3584
48
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
5 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
123.6 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.15 TFLOPS
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.07 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
346.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
TU102
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
TU102-100-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
