NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs Intel Arc Pro A60
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 12GB VRAM Arc Pro A60 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 130W)
Intel Arc Pro A60 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 72% (2050MHz vs 1190MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A60
+359%
8.397 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Jun 2023
GeForce 900
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
16
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
131.2 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
262.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
16.79 TFLOPS
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.397 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
130W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
DG2-256
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
11.5 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
269 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
