NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs Intel Arc Pro A50
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 97% (2350MHz vs 1190MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A50
+163%
4.813 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Aug 2022
GeForce 900
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
DG2-128
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
