NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock928MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2080 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
+434%
5.345 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2013
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 700
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
875 MHz
Base Clock
-
928 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
2880
Shading Units
800
240
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
222.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.345 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
222.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
RV770
GK110-425-B1
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
