NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample vs NVIDIA RTX A4000H
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample and 16GB VRAM RTX A4000H to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4000H 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 68% (1560MHz vs 928MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 336.6GB/s)
3264 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (140W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
5.345 TFLOPS
RTX A4000H
+258%
19.17 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 700
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
875 MHz
Base Clock
735 MHz
928 MHz
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
48
2880
Shading Units
6144
240
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
222.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
5.345 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
222.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
140W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK180
GPU Name
GA104
GK180-425-A1
GPU Variant
GA104-???-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.175
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
