NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample vs Moore Threads MTT S4000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample 's Advantages
Boost Clock928MHz
Lower TDP (250W vs 450W)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 336.6GB/s)
5312 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
5.345 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+359%
24.58 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 700
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
875 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
928 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
2880
Shading Units
8192
240
TMUs
512
48
ROPs
512
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
222.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
5.345 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
222.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
450W
600 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK180
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
GK180-425-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
22 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.175
Vulkan
1.4
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
