NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 71% (1590MHz vs 928MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
+87%
5.345 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
2.849 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2020
GeForce 700
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
875 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
928 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
2880
Shading Units
896
240
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
222.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
5.345 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
222.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK180
GPU Name
TU117
GK180-425-A1
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.175
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
