NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 vs AMD Radeon Pro V320
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 770 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 38% (1500MHz vs 1085MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 224.4GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 770
3.333 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V320
+222%
10.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2013
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 700
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1046 MHz
Base Clock
852 MHz
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
224.4GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
3584
128
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
34.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
138.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
3.333 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
138.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
230W
TDP
230W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
Vega 10
GK104-425-A2
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER
(215-0894144)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
