Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 765M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M 's Advantages
Boost Clock863MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 765M
1.326 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +125%
2.989 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 700M
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

797 MHz
Base Clock
-
863 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
768
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

13.81 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.69 GPixel/s
55.23 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.41 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1326 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.989 TFLOPS
55.23 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
373.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
Amethyst
N14E-GE-B-A1
GPU Variant
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
5 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy