Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs AMD FirePro W4100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs AMD FirePro W4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock980MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 170W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM +308%
2.634 TFLOPS
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2013
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 700
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
-
980 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
1344
Shading Units
512
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

27.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.08 GPixel/s
109.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.16 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.634 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
645.1 GFLOPS
109.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.32 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

170W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy