NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs AMD FirePro W600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1085MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (86.40GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
+80%
1.389 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 700
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1020 MHz
Base Clock
-
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
512
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
43.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1389 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
43.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
Cape Verde
GM107-400-A2
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Maxwell
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
