NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs ATI FirePro V3900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock1085MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (86.40GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
+122%
1.389 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
Feb 2012
GeForce 700
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1020 MHz
Base Clock
-
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
480
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
43.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1389 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
43.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
Turks
GM107-400-A2
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Maxwell
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0
