NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs ATI FireGL V8650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1085MHz
320 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
+215%
1.389 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
Aug 2007
GeForce 700
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1020 MHz
Base Clock
-
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
320
40
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
43.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1389 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
43.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
R600
GM107-400-A2
GPU Variant
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
Maxwell
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
