Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 690 and 96GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 4.10GB/s)
Lower TDP (300W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 80% (1837MHz vs 1019MHz)
More VRAM (96GB vs 2GB)
15360 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 690
3.13 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +1883%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2012
Release Date
Jan 2024
GeForce 600
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
1665 MHz
1019 MHz
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
96GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
4.10TB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
132
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
16896
128
TMUs
528
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB

Theoretical Performance

32.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
130.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
3.130 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
130.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GB100
GK104-355-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
208 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

300W
TDP
1000W
700 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
9.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy