NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M vs AMD FirePro M6000
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680M and 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M 's Advantages
Boost Clock758MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680M
+99%
2.038 TFLOPS
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jul 2012
GeForce 600M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
719 MHz
Base Clock
-
758 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
640
112
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
84.90 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.038 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1024 GFLOPS
84.90 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
64.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
43W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
Heathrow
N13E-GTX-A2
GPU Variant
Heathrow XT GL
(216-0835033)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
