NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 's Advantages
Lower TDP (195W vs 250W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 141% (2550MHz vs 1058MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
11264 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680
3.25 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+1908%
65.28 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 680
2004
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+607%
14170
Graphics Card
Mar 2012
Release Date
Aug 2023
GeForce 600
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1006 MHz
Base Clock
1155 MHz
1058 MHz
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
100
1536
Shading Units
12800
128
TMUs
400
32
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
400
-
RT Cores
100
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
135.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
3.250 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
135.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS
Board Design
195W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
AD102
GK104-400-A2
GPU Variant
AD102
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
