Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 vs ATI Radeon X1050 AGP

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 vs ATI Radeon X1050 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1058MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1050 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (24W vs 195W)

Score

Graphics Card

Mar 2012
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 600
Generation
Radeon R300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

1006 MHz
Base Clock
-
1058 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
203 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
6.496GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
-
128
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
135.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.250 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
135.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

195W
TDP
24W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
RV360
GK104-400-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.06 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
76 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0 (9_0)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
-
© 2025 - TopCPU.net