NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 660M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 112% (2010MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 660M
0.73 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+1591%
12.35 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2012
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 600M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
835 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
384
Shading Units
3072
32
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
30.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
729.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
30.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
AD107
N13E-GE-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
