NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
0.73 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
+1679%
12.99 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2013
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 600M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1635 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
384
Shading Units
3072
32
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.5 GPixel/s
30.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
203.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.99 TFLOPS
729.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.99 TFLOPS
30.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
203.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
