NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages
Boost Clock1032MHz
Lower TDP (134W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 144.2GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
1.585 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 295X2
+261%
5.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Apr 2014
GeForce 600
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
980 MHz
Base Clock
-
1032 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
512bit
144.2GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2816
64
TMUs
176
24
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
384 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.15 GPixel/s
66.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.585 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.733 TFLOPS
66.05 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
500W
300 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
Vesuvius
GK106-240-A1
GPU Variant
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3
