NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.3GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
416 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 170W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
+26%
1.263 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 500
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.3GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
8
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
800
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
13.17 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
52.67 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1263 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
105.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
170W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF114
GPU Name
RV770
GF114-400-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
