NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 485M and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
9344 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 485M
0.883 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+3602%
32.69 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 400M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
76
384
Shading Units
9728
64
TMUs
304
32
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
36.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
883.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
73.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
150W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
AD103
N12E-GTX-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
