NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 134.4GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
1.078 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+1013%
12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 400
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
134.4GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
22
512
Shading Units
2816
64
TMUs
88
48
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
33.73 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
1078 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
375W
TDP
70W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
AD107
GF100-ES-DT1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
