NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES vs NVIDIA RTX A1000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES and 8GB VRAM RTX A1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A1000 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1462MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1280GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 128.3GB/s)
1968 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES
1.046 TFLOPS
RTX A1000
+544%
6.737 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2011
Release Date
Apr 2024
GeForce 400
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
727 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1462 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1280MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.3GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
7
SM Count
18
336
Shading Units
2304
56
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
72
-
RT Cores
18
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.91 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.78 GPixel/s
43.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
105.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.737 TFLOPS
1046 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.737 TFLOPS
87.19 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
105.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF114
GPU Name
GA107
GF114-400-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
