NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.3GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1845MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1280GB)
1072 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES
1.046 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300 XT
+396%
5.196 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2011
Release Date
Oct 2019
GeForce 400
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1670 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1845 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1280MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.3GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
22
7
SM Count
-
336
Shading Units
1408
56
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.91 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.04 GPixel/s
43.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
162.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.39 TFLOPS
1046 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
87.19 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
324.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF114
GPU Name
Navi 14
GF114-400-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XL
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
