NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES vs Moore Threads MTT S2000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 1280GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 128.3GB/s)
3760 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES
1.046 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+918%
10.65 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2011
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 400
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1300 MHz
-
-
-
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1280MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.3GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
7
SM Count
-
336
Shading Units
4096
56
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.91 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
43.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
1046 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
87.19 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF114
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
GF114-400-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
Unknown
332 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
