NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (1280GB vs 1024GB)
96 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (160W vs 204W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 128.3GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES
+47%
1.046 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2011
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 400
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz
Memory
1280MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
128.3GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
7
SM Count
30
336
Shading Units
240
56
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.91 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
43.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1046 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
87.19 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
204W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF114
GPU Name
GT200B
GF114-400-A1
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
